The McDonnell Douglas MD-91X was a proposed long-range variant of the MD-90 family, designed to expand the capabilities of the legendary DC-9/MD-80/MD-90 aircraft line. Although it never entered full production, the MD-91X remains an interesting chapter in commercial aviation history—representing McDonnell Douglas’ final efforts to modernize its narrow-body platform before its merger with Boeing.
McDonnell Douglas MD-91X
What Was the McDonnell Douglas MD-91X?
The McDonnell Douglas MD-91X was envisioned as a long-range derivative of the McDonnell Douglas MD-90, developed by McDonnell Douglas in the early 1990s.
The “X” designation typically signified extended range and performance enhancements, including:
Increased fuel capacity
Higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW)
Improved range for longer routes
Upgraded avionics and systems
The goal was to compete more directly with aircraft such as the Boeing 737-800 and Airbus A320 variants.
Development Background
During the late 1980s and early 1990s, airlines demanded:
Greater fuel efficiency
Longer range narrow-body aircraft
Compliance with stricter environmental regulations
McDonnell Douglas had already introduced the MD-90 as an improved version of the MD-80 family, featuring modern IAE V2500 engines and upgraded systems. The MD-91X was proposed as a further enhancement—offering more range while maintaining commonality with existing fleets.
However, limited sales of the MD-90 and increasing competition from Airbus and Boeing made development financially challenging.
Planned Specifications (Conceptual)
While the MD-91X never entered production, industry proposals suggested the following improvements over the MD-90:
Expected Enhancements
Extended Range: Estimated beyond 2,500 nautical miles
Higher MTOW: To support additional fuel and payload
Seating Capacity: Similar to MD-90 (150–170 passengers)
Engines: IAE V2500 series turbofans
Avionics: Advanced EFIS cockpit systems
Because the aircraft remained in proposal stages, exact technical specifications were never finalized.
How the MD-91X Compared to Competitors
During its conceptual phase, the MD-91X would have competed with:
Boeing 737-800
Airbus A320
Both competitors offered:
Strong fuel efficiency
Wider global sales networks
Continuous development investment
McDonnell Douglas faced difficulties securing sufficient orders to justify launching the MD-91X program.
Why the MD-91X Was Never Built
Several key factors led to the cancellation of the MD-91X:
1. Limited MD-90 Sales
The MD-90 itself had modest commercial success, making further investment risky.
2. Boeing–McDonnell Douglas Merger
In 1997, Boeing merged with McDonnell Douglas. After the merger, Boeing focused on expanding the 737 family rather than continuing MD-90 development.
3. Market Competition
Airbus aggressively expanded the A320 program, while Boeing continuously upgraded the 737 series. The MD-91X struggled to secure a competitive advantage.
As a result, the MD-91X remained a paper project.
Legacy of the MD-91X Concept
Although it never flew, the MD-91X represents:
The final attempt to extend the DC-9/MD-80 lineage
McDonnell Douglas’ strategy to modernize its narrow-body portfolio
A transitional moment before Boeing consolidated its product lineup
The cancellation effectively marked the end of new developments within the MD-80/MD-90 family.
The End of the DC-9 Lineage
The DC-9 family evolved through several generations:
DC-9
MD-80 series
MD-90
Proposed MD-91X
After the Boeing merger, focus shifted entirely toward the 737 program, closing the chapter on one of aviation’s longest-running narrow-body families.
Conclusion
The McDonnell Douglas MD-91X may never have taken to the skies, but it remains an important “what-if” in commercial aviation history. As a proposed long-range extension of the MD-90 platform, it demonstrated McDonnell Douglas’ efforts to remain competitive during a rapidly changing aerospace market.
While overshadowed by the success of the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 families, the MD-91X stands as a symbol of the final evolution of the iconic DC-9 heritage.
MORE: